![]() Large sections of the American press are like Mr. (One need only look to the loss of market share and trust the mainstream media have experienced to know that all is not well - or the studies and monographs on the triumph of ideology over reporting in major American newspapers.)Nor does she show a logical connection between her observations about ignorance of the audience and the silence about Gosnell.Ĭriticisms voiced by GetReligion have nothing to do with the private conscience of reporters who write about religion but about their ignorance of the topics they are covering coupled with a self-satisfied, complacent, high opinion of their own importance and disdain for views that conflict with their own. That large sections of the media believe an abortionist charged with multiple counts of murder is a crime story without significant religious or moral overtones speaks to the failings and biases of the press, not readers. There is just a hint of Coriolanus going before the plebs here. The notion that the news media is a secularist cabal ignoring stories that challenge its shibboleths is wrongheaded. Yet cultural religionists imply that the absence of religious commitment in the nation’s newsrooms-and consequent acceptance of baby-killing, oops abortion, is among the reasons that the Gosnell story was overlooked. People with religious convictions may read their passions into it, but Gosnell did not seem to be motivated one way or the other by a faith commitment. The Gosnell story is not a religion story, it’s a crime story. Making more Americans aware of religion and historical incidents like an anti-Hindu press - a history of which I was not aware - would not have mattered in the Gosnell story as: Yet, I’m not convinced that improving the American educational system is really at the heart of Cannon’s plaint about religion coverage and his subsequent post on Kermit Gosnell. ![]() Religion is absent from many high school curricula and university classrooms, and many of us barely know the religious history of our own country much less the role of religion worldwide. Trained religion reporters, but rather Americans’ widespread ignorance about religion. Menken’s critique of Fundamentalism in his account of the Scope’s “monkey” trial or the “anti-Hindu coverage that ran through Western newspapers in the 1910s and 1920s.” The crux of her argument is that the problem is not a lack of: In support of this contention, the article offers historical examples purporting to show the press has always done a poor job - missing stories, printing pablum in place of news or voicing prejudice such as H.L.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |